Tehran is willing to reinitiate nuclear discussions with the United States as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has stated.
Abbas Araghchi stated exclusively dialogue produced results, and revealed new appeals had originated from mediators to resume discussions with the Trump administration. He said Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Iran had not yet reached a point to authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to access struck enrichment centers for security reasons.
Araghchi is walking a complex path since Iran does not want be perceived to be acting from a stance of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out more powerful militarily and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.
He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium domestically that it will never give up" – the key factor of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.
The previous five rounds of talks between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter termination on 12 June when Israel, with US support, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that ended with the American leader claiming the facilities had been obliterated. Following this, Western states exercised their authority to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.
Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.
It had not been settled in the discussions that American atomic experts could work within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Officials claimed on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy the US official only for the deal to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".
Tehran representatives declared the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be revived in certain ways if talks resume.
Trump last week said he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but privately Tehran representatives say they are not yet getting coherent offers from America either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been criticized of inactivity in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says negotiations is not part of a performance.
In his address to the forum, aimed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi said the 12-day war showed the dispute could not be ended by combat operations. He asserted the attacks began with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and concluded with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.
Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with complete American awareness and coordination, making trust difficult to reestablish.
Araghchi said: "It was not Iran that had abandoned diplomacy; it was the United States and the western countries that had consistently sought to impose their desires during the talks. Dialogue can still be active and continues the final solution to settle disagreements, but its criteria, rules and principles must be adhered to."
"In case they speak to the nation of Iran with the tone of dignity and honor, they will get a response in the identical language."
In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the struggle of repair and recovery, Araghchi stated he was confident Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We acquired many lessons from this engagement; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the adversary."
He added: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to eliminate, continues to exist. The sites and equipment, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is important is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but failed to break. The citizens of Tehran have grown stronger, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the government and the country in the wake of this invasion."